Technical documentation

Hoodlympus DAO

How Hoodlympus adapts the Olympus-style reserve-currency model for TradFi: protocol-owned liquidity, tokenized equities, and Uniswap v4 hook revenue — with rebases that track real productive output.

Overview

The DeFi reserve-currency model introduced by OlympusDAO was one of the most significant tokenomics experiments in crypto: a protocol that owns its own liquidity and programmatically backs a native asset. The first generation still depended on reflexive supply expansion. Hoodlympus keeps the POL / bonding / staking loop, but changes what sits under it.

Instead of stablecoins and idle LP as the long-term floor, Hoodlympus anchors $hOHM to tokenized US equities and puts treasury liquidity to work in Uniswap v4 pools with custom hooks. Stakers hold $sthOHM — the yield-bearing, auto-compounding representation of $hOHM — and earn rebases funded by excess reserves, hook fees, and early-unbond penalties.

Wall Street assets. Programmatic backing. (3,3) goes TradFi.

Why the First Generation Broke

Olympus demonstrated two durable ideas: protocol-owned liquidity (POL) — the treasury acquires and controls liquidity depth — and bonding — discounted native-token issuance in exchange for capital. Those mechanics are sound. The failure mode was how inflation was justified.

Olympus-style systems expanded supply against mostly static collateral (stablecoins and LP positions). While bond volume was high, inflows refreshed the treasury and rebases looked earned. When bonding cooled, collateral growth stalled — but emissions did not have an independent, external revenue engine large enough to support market cap once sentiment turned.

When bonding is hot

Bond volume rises
Treasury grows
Rebases look sustainable
More capital inflows

When bonding cools

Bond volume falls
Collateral growth stalls
Rebases keep expanding supply
Static backing meets exponential emissions
(3,3) tips into sell pressure

The hinge is sentiment: the same mechanism reads as virtuous on the way up and reflexive on the way down.

In short: backing was static while emissions remained exponential. The (3,3) equilibrium — stake and hold for mutual benefit — collapsed into sell pressure because the treasury was not continuously earning outside the reflexive loop.

The Hoodlympus Thesis

For a reserve currency to stay sustainable, its backing must do two jobs at once:

  • Capture real-world value — collateral that can appreciate with productive economic activity, not only crypto reflexivity.
  • Generate continuous external revenue — cashflows that do not require perpetual new bond inflows to fund staker rewards.
Tokenized US equities feed the treasury floor
Uniswap v4 hook fees + early-unbond penalties feed external revenue
Treasury floor + external revenue fund sustainable rebases
Paid out to $sthOHM holders

Hoodlympus addresses both: tokenized equities as the reserve base, and Uniswap v4 hooks plus vesting penalties as ongoing, non-inflationary revenue. Rebases are then framed as a distribution of that productive surplus — not as unbacked printing.

Tokens

Naming matters because only one of the two protocol tokens rebases for the holder.

TokenWhat it isDoes it rebase?
$hOHM Protocol asset — the algorithmic reserve currency minted via bonding and used across pools and staking. No. Unstaked $hOHM does not receive rebases and absorbs dilution relative to stakers.
$sthOHM Staking token — received 1:1 when staking $hOHM. Yield-bearing and auto-compounding. Yes. Balance increases each epoch as the protocol distributes the rebase.
Tokenized equities Collateral base — e.g. TSLA, NVDA, AAPL — deposited into the treasury via bonding and used in $hOHM / RWA liquidity. N/A (backing assets)

Bonding: How Capital Enters

Bonding is the primary path for growing protocol-owned collateral. Users deposit supported tokenized US equities into the Hoodlympus treasury and mint $hOHM at a discount relative to market, subject to a dynamic vesting schedule.

That discount is the incentive to supply real collateral instead of buying $hOHM on the open market. Vesting paces issuance so newly minted supply does not hit liquidity all at once. Exiting before vesting completes incurs a programmatic penalty — which becomes yield for stakers rather than disappearing from the system.

User deposits tokenized equity (TSLA / NVDA / AAPL)
Treasury receives collateral, protocol mints $hOHM at a discount
Dynamic vesting schedule begins
Vesting completes: claim $hOHM, then stake into $sthOHM — or hold / trade $hOHM
Exit early: pay a penalty fee, routed to the staking pool for $sthOHM holders

Equity collateral also changes the character of the floor: unlike pure stablecoin backing, tokenized stocks expose the treasury to institutional growth assets. As those markets expand, the underlying reserve can strengthen even when crypto-native inflows are quiet.

Yield Engine: Uniswap v4 Hooks

The architectural upgrade is how treasury capital is used. Rather than sitting idle, reserves are deployed into Uniswap v4 custom pools ($hOHM paired with RWA) managed by dedicated hooks. That produces two revenue streams that do not require minting $hOHM to exist:

  • Dynamic trading fee capture — activity in $hOHM / RWA pools triggers hook logic that extracts trading fees in tokenized equities and routes them back to the treasury. Fees are real external demand paying the protocol for liquidity.
  • Early unbonding penalties — bonders who leave vesting early pay a calculated fee. Those fees are redirected to the staking pool to reward long-term $sthOHM holders.
Swaps route through Uniswap v4 $hOHM / RWA pools, run under custom hooks
Hook fees, paid in tokenized equities, flow to the treasury
Early-unbond penalties flow to the staking pool
Treasury revenue + staking pool revenue become rebase inputs

Together, fee capture and penalties give the system income even when net new bonding slows — the missing piece in first-generation reflexive designs.

Staking & Rebases

Staking converts $hOHM → $sthOHM. Holders of $sthOHM keep exposure to the equity-backed treasury while earning yield tied to DEX volume and protocol penalties. Their $sthOHM balance increases automatically each epoch.

Rebases on Hoodlympus are defined as a function of productive surplus — not a fixed high APY independent of the treasury:

Rebase Rate = f(Excess Reserves, Hook Trading Fees, Vesting Penalties)
  • Excess reserves — how much treasury value (in RWA terms) sits above what is needed to back circulating $hOHM supply.
  • Hook trading fees — real volume-driven revenue collected through Uniswap v4 hooks.
  • Vesting penalties — early-exit fees from bonders, streamed to stakers.
Excess reserves + hook trading fees + vesting penalties feed the rebase-rate function
$sthOHM balances increase each epoch
Unstaked $hOHM absorbs the relative dilution

$sthOHM holders receive the rebase and retain their pro-rata claim on a growing, equity-backed treasury. Unstaked $hOHM holders do not receive rebases; they absorb the relative dilution that pays for long-term alignment. That separation is intentional: the reserve asset stays liquid and tradable, while staking is where protocol yield accrues.

Capital Flows

End-to-end, capital moves from RWA deposits into treasury ownership, through productive liquidity, and into staker rewards:

User capital (RWA) enters through bonding or staking
Bonding discount-mints $hOHM and deposits collateral into the treasury
Treasury capital works in Uniswap v4 $hOHM / RWA pools; hook fees flow back to the treasury
Early-exit penalties, plus treasury excess reserves and fee revenue, fund the staking pool
Staking distributes an epoch rebase to $sthOHM; $hOHM can also be staked 1:1 into $sthOHM
LayerComponentRole
Protocol asset$hOHMAlgorithmic reserve currency
Staking token$sthOHMYield-bearing & auto-compounding
Collateral baseTokenized US equitiesTSLA, NVDA, AAPL, …
ExecutionUniswap v4 hooks + bondingFee capture and discounted mint

Game Theory: (3,3) with Productive Backing

The original (3,3) slogan meant coordination: if participants stake and the treasury deepens, everyone benefits more than by racing for exits. That story only holds when staking rewards are funded by something real. Hoodlympus keeps the same coordination surface — bond to grow the floor, stake to earn the surplus — but ties the surplus to equity-backed reserves and market activity.

ActionWhat you doWhy the protocol cares
Bond Deposit RWA, mint discounted $hOHM under vesting Expands treasury collateral and the reserve floor
Stake (3,3) Lock $hOHM as $sthOHM; receive epoch rebases Aligns holders with excess reserves, fees, and penalties
Stay unstaked Hold or trade $hOHM without staking Liquidity and optionality — but no rebase; relative dilution vs stakers

Early exits from bonds do not “break” the model the way reflexive sell cascades did in first-generation systems: penalties recycle into the staking pool, and swap activity on protocol-owned liquidity still pays the treasury through hooks.

Deployment

  • Network — Robinhood Chain
  • Collateral — Tokenized US equities (TSLA, NVDA, AAPL, and additional listings as supported)
  • DEX / execution — Uniswap v4 hooks on $hOHM / RWA pools, plus custom bonding contracts

Hoodlympus DAO is coming soon on Robinhood Chain.

Contracts

Core protocol contracts on Robinhood Chain. Addresses will be published at launch.

ContractRoleAddress
$hOHMAlgorithmic reserve currencyComing soon
$sthOHMStaked $hOHM (rebase / auto-compound)Coming soon
BondingDiscounted RWA → $hOHM mintComing soon
TreasuryEquity collateral vaultComing soon
StakingEpoch rebase for $sthOHMComing soon
Uniswap v4 HookFee capture on $hOHM / RWA poolsComing soon