Technical documentation
How Hoodlympus adapts the Olympus-style reserve-currency model for TradFi: protocol-owned liquidity, tokenized equities, and Uniswap v4 hook revenue — with rebases that track real productive output.
The DeFi reserve-currency model introduced by OlympusDAO was one of the most significant tokenomics experiments in crypto: a protocol that owns its own liquidity and programmatically backs a native asset. The first generation still depended on reflexive supply expansion. Hoodlympus keeps the POL / bonding / staking loop, but changes what sits under it.
Instead of stablecoins and idle LP as the long-term floor, Hoodlympus anchors $hOHM to tokenized US equities and puts treasury liquidity to work in Uniswap v4 pools with custom hooks. Stakers hold $sthOHM — the yield-bearing, auto-compounding representation of $hOHM — and earn rebases funded by excess reserves, hook fees, and early-unbond penalties.
Wall Street assets. Programmatic backing. (3,3) goes TradFi.
Olympus demonstrated two durable ideas: protocol-owned liquidity (POL) — the treasury acquires and controls liquidity depth — and bonding — discounted native-token issuance in exchange for capital. Those mechanics are sound. The failure mode was how inflation was justified.
Olympus-style systems expanded supply against mostly static collateral (stablecoins and LP positions). While bond volume was high, inflows refreshed the treasury and rebases looked earned. When bonding cooled, collateral growth stalled — but emissions did not have an independent, external revenue engine large enough to support market cap once sentiment turned.
When bonding is hot
When bonding cools
The hinge is sentiment: the same mechanism reads as virtuous on the way up and reflexive on the way down.
In short: backing was static while emissions remained exponential. The (3,3) equilibrium — stake and hold for mutual benefit — collapsed into sell pressure because the treasury was not continuously earning outside the reflexive loop.
For a reserve currency to stay sustainable, its backing must do two jobs at once:
Hoodlympus addresses both: tokenized equities as the reserve base, and Uniswap v4 hooks plus vesting penalties as ongoing, non-inflationary revenue. Rebases are then framed as a distribution of that productive surplus — not as unbacked printing.
Naming matters because only one of the two protocol tokens rebases for the holder.
| Token | What it is | Does it rebase? |
|---|---|---|
| $hOHM | Protocol asset — the algorithmic reserve currency minted via bonding and used across pools and staking. | No. Unstaked $hOHM does not receive rebases and absorbs dilution relative to stakers. |
| $sthOHM | Staking token — received 1:1 when staking $hOHM. Yield-bearing and auto-compounding. | Yes. Balance increases each epoch as the protocol distributes the rebase. |
| Tokenized equities | Collateral base — e.g. TSLA, NVDA, AAPL — deposited into the treasury via bonding and used in $hOHM / RWA liquidity. | N/A (backing assets) |
Bonding is the primary path for growing protocol-owned collateral. Users deposit supported tokenized US equities into the Hoodlympus treasury and mint $hOHM at a discount relative to market, subject to a dynamic vesting schedule.
That discount is the incentive to supply real collateral instead of buying $hOHM on the open market. Vesting paces issuance so newly minted supply does not hit liquidity all at once. Exiting before vesting completes incurs a programmatic penalty — which becomes yield for stakers rather than disappearing from the system.
Equity collateral also changes the character of the floor: unlike pure stablecoin backing, tokenized stocks expose the treasury to institutional growth assets. As those markets expand, the underlying reserve can strengthen even when crypto-native inflows are quiet.
The architectural upgrade is how treasury capital is used. Rather than sitting idle, reserves are deployed into Uniswap v4 custom pools ($hOHM paired with RWA) managed by dedicated hooks. That produces two revenue streams that do not require minting $hOHM to exist:
Together, fee capture and penalties give the system income even when net new bonding slows — the missing piece in first-generation reflexive designs.
Staking converts $hOHM → $sthOHM. Holders of $sthOHM keep exposure to the equity-backed treasury while earning yield tied to DEX volume and protocol penalties. Their $sthOHM balance increases automatically each epoch.
Rebases on Hoodlympus are defined as a function of productive surplus — not a fixed high APY independent of the treasury:
$sthOHM holders receive the rebase and retain their pro-rata claim on a growing, equity-backed treasury. Unstaked $hOHM holders do not receive rebases; they absorb the relative dilution that pays for long-term alignment. That separation is intentional: the reserve asset stays liquid and tradable, while staking is where protocol yield accrues.
End-to-end, capital moves from RWA deposits into treasury ownership, through productive liquidity, and into staker rewards:
| Layer | Component | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Protocol asset | $hOHM | Algorithmic reserve currency |
| Staking token | $sthOHM | Yield-bearing & auto-compounding |
| Collateral base | Tokenized US equities | TSLA, NVDA, AAPL, … |
| Execution | Uniswap v4 hooks + bonding | Fee capture and discounted mint |
The original (3,3) slogan meant coordination: if participants stake and the treasury deepens, everyone benefits more than by racing for exits. That story only holds when staking rewards are funded by something real. Hoodlympus keeps the same coordination surface — bond to grow the floor, stake to earn the surplus — but ties the surplus to equity-backed reserves and market activity.
| Action | What you do | Why the protocol cares |
|---|---|---|
| Bond | Deposit RWA, mint discounted $hOHM under vesting | Expands treasury collateral and the reserve floor |
| Stake (3,3) | Lock $hOHM as $sthOHM; receive epoch rebases | Aligns holders with excess reserves, fees, and penalties |
| Stay unstaked | Hold or trade $hOHM without staking | Liquidity and optionality — but no rebase; relative dilution vs stakers |
Early exits from bonds do not “break” the model the way reflexive sell cascades did in first-generation systems: penalties recycle into the staking pool, and swap activity on protocol-owned liquidity still pays the treasury through hooks.
Hoodlympus DAO is coming soon on Robinhood Chain.
Core protocol contracts on Robinhood Chain. Addresses will be published at launch.
| Contract | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| $hOHM | Algorithmic reserve currency | Coming soon |
| $sthOHM | Staked $hOHM (rebase / auto-compound) | Coming soon |
| Bonding | Discounted RWA → $hOHM mint | Coming soon |
| Treasury | Equity collateral vault | Coming soon |
| Staking | Epoch rebase for $sthOHM | Coming soon |
| Uniswap v4 Hook | Fee capture on $hOHM / RWA pools | Coming soon |